Saturday, January 14, 2017

1.5 Assignment Research: History of UAS

History of UAS
Introduction
            Unmanned aerial vehicles have been around for a number of years. UAVs have been a powerful tool in the military and the civilian sector. During World War I, UAVs were used to perform missions over the Western Front in 1917 and 1918 (Blom, 2010). The missions that were conducted using UAVs are similar to the missions seen in Iraq and Afghanistan in modern times. According to Blom (2010), UAVs in the past and present have been used to adjust indirect fires, gather information regarding enemy movement, perform battle damage assessment, and provide target acquisition. In 1955, the United States Army started performing reconnaissance missions with UAVs; the Radioplane RP-71 was one of the UAVs tested during this time. As technology has advanced, UAVs have become a big part of the military and are being used more in the civilian sector. UAVs have many different purposes within the world today. From reconnaissance and damage assessments in the military to photography and disaster assessments, UAVs will become a huge part of the aviation industry in the coming years. The RQ-7 Shadow 200 is a relatively new UAV being utilized by the military.
Radioplane RP-71 Falconer
            The Radioplane RP-71 Falconer had a wingspan of 12 feet and could ascend into the atmosphere at 3,000 feet per minute (Blom, 2010). The RP-71 could reach a top speed of 185 miles per hours and could fly at altitudes between a few hundred feet and up to 4 miles. The endurance of the RP-71 was 30 minutes according to Blom (2010).The RP-71 took several minutes to launch. A catapult launch system was used to send the RP-71 into the sky (Blom, 2010).  The RP-71 utilized a solid rocket booster from zero length launcher (Northrop Radioplane RP-71, n.d.). The RP-71 would be recovered by deploying a parachute. One benefit that the RP-71 had over traditional aircraft was that this UAV could be flown in weather that would be hazardous to other aircraft. The RP-71 had advanced technology during its conception. This UAV used cameras and had an optional TV (Northrop Radioplane RP-71, n.d.). The pictures taken by the RP-71 took some time to process, but an operator could have the pictures in under an hour (Blom, 2010). The RP-71 was also designated as MQM-57 and was a reconnaissance unmanned vehicle. An operator would fly the UAV via radio signals and was tracked by radar (USAF, 2015).
RQ-7 Shadow 200
            The RQ-7 Shadow 200 is a UAV that was developed to locate and identify targets on the battlefield. The Shadow can fly up to 15,000 feet and has a cruising speed of 127 knots (RQ-7 Shadow UAV). The Shadow is launched from a hydraulic rail launcher and has the ability to climb at a rate between 1,000 to 1,500 feet per minute (Shadow 200 RQ-7, n.d.). Compared to the RP-71, the RQ-7 can carry heavier payloads for longer periods of time. This UAV incorporates incredible electro optical and infrared sensors that give the operator the ability to capture video and pictures during the day and night (RQ-7 Shadow UAV). The RQ-7 is easily recoverable; it has a conventional landing gear and can land on a flat surface if there is a surface that is 95 meters in length. The RQ-7 Shadow is controlled through a sophisticated ground control system. The ground control station is suited with vehicle control settings and C4I interface software (Shadow 200 RQ-7, n.d.). The operating procedures for the RQ-7 had to be redesigned during US campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan due to the intense heat and massive amounts of sand building up on the UAV (RQ-7 Shadow UAV, n.d.).
Comparison between the RP-71 and the RQ-7 Shadow 200
            The Radioplane RP-71 Falconer and the RQ- Shadow 200 are similar in purpose. The RP-71 and the RQ-7 are launched with the aid of a catapult system, but the benefit of the RQ-7 is that it can be launched without the aid of a catapult system. Both of these unmanned aerial vehicles have been used for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance. Damage assessment is still completed by the RQ-7 Shadow. While the Shadow seems to have more uses overall, the RP-71 has the ability to fly at a faster rate (185 mph in the RP-71 compared to 127 in the RQ-7 Shadow) and the RP-71 can fly at higher altitudes than the RQ-7. However, the flight times are very different when comparing these two UAVs. The RP-71 could fly for 30 minutes while the RQ-7 could fly for 6 hours (RQ-7 Shadow UAV, n.d.). The RQ-7 has a technologically advanced sensor package compared to the RP-71’s radio transmission and radar contact tracking systems. Unlike the RP-71, the ground control station that is utilized by the operator of the RQ-7 provides the operator with real time footage that the cameras are picking up. The RP-71 had cameras and an optional TV, but it took some time to develop the pictures that the UAV took during flight. The advances in technology have now required operators to need more room to transport the UAVs to a specific location. The RP-71, the launcher, and the control system could be transported by two standard 6x6 trucks with trailers (Blom, 2010). A single RQ-7 can be transported by two military vehicles (Shadow 200 RQ-7, n.d.). The RP-71 had an identical wingspan of 12 feet (Blom, 2010). In comparison, the RQ-7 Shadow had a wingspan of just over 12 feet.
Conclusions
            With the advancements in technology and the creation of the RQ-7 Shadow, military operators using the Shadow are able to gather intel and perform reconnaissance missions more efficiently. There does seem to be one limitation with the RQ-7 Shadow; the top speed seems to be lacking. Compared to the RP-71, the RQ-7 is much slower (185 mph vs. 127 mph.). While speed is not necessarily always needed, it may be beneficial for the RQ-7 to fly at a faster rate. As new technology is created for UAVs such as the RQ-7, operators should determine if there are any flaws in the response times of the RQ-7 during flight. GPS has become the standard for operations around the world. GPS may not be a new technology, but any improvements on this system could potentially influence the system capabilities of the RQ-7. It is likely that military UAVs will continue to receive the latest and greatest in the area of optics for the cameras on board the RQ-7. An increase in the flight time of the RQ-7 could greatly influence the system capabilities of the RQ-7 and would be beneficial to long range reconnaissance missions.

References
Blom, J. D. (2010). Unmanned Aerial Systems: A Historical Perspective. Fort Leavenworth, KS: Combat Studies Institute Press.    
doi:http://usacac.army.mil/cac2/cgsc/carl/download/csipubs/OP37.pdf

Northrop Radioplane RP-71 Falconer, SD-l. (n.d.). Retrieved from      http://www.wmof.com/rp71falconer.html

RQ-7 Shadow UAV. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://olive-            drab.com/idphoto/id_photos_uav_rq7.php

Shadow 200 RQ-7 Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.army-technology.com/projects/shadow200uav/


USAF. (2015). Radioplane/Northrop MQM-57 Falconer. Retrieved from             http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/Visit/MuseumExhibits/FactSheets/Display/tabid/509/            Article/195784/radioplanenorthrop-mqm-57-falconer.aspx

No comments:

Post a Comment