Sunday, February 5, 2017

UAS in the NAS

UAS in the NAS
Part 1
            Detect, sense, and avoid technology is still in early development for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). The absence of detect, sense, and avoid in current UAVs will undoubtedly lead to accidents both on the ground and in the National Airspace System (NAS). Due to the absence of detect, sense, and avoid technology, other technologies must be utilized to separate manned and unmanned aircraft. Safety has always been a concern in the aviation industry, but many of the regulations have been written in blood. With UAVs becoming increasing popular in the civilian sector, hobbyists and businesses are utilizing UAVs in many different ways. With the number of UAVs increasing at a dramatic rate, new regulations will need to be developed to ensure the safety of the aviation industry.
            There are several options available that could be utilized to reduce the risks of UAVs interacting with manned aircraft. First and foremost, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) should continue to develop and establish operator certification requirements. It is critical that UAV operators know certification requirements and airspace rules concerning the usage of UAVs. The FAA should assess the capabilities of UAVs. There are many kinds of UAVs; altitudes, speeds, communication abilities, and flight times will vary greatly depending on the class of UAV. An assessment of the capabilities of UAVs while also utilizing ground crews and ATC could help the FAA narrow down new regulations. The next option is to spend time and money creating detect, sense, and avoid technology. With this technology, UAVs will be able to “see” obstructions and other aircraft. Finally, current technologies such as ADS-B and TCAS could be implemented into UAVs in order to separate manned and unmanned aircraft.
Part 2
            There are five group classifications for UAVs. Groups 1 and 2 are micro and mini UAVs. These UAVs are likely to be operated via visual flight rules (VFR). If micro and mini UAVs are being operated within a line of sight, there would not necessarily be a need for detect, sense, and avoid technology. However, due to limitations with human eyes, the brain can distort the exact position of the UAV when another aircraft is nearby. Spatial disorientation becomes an issue with the UAV operator when the UAV moves out to a distance beyond what the operator can see. When a UAV moves out of the line of sight of the flight crew, the responsibility of sensing and avoiding cannot be assumed by the flight crew (Prats. Delgado, Ramirez, Royo, & Pastor, 2012). With these issues in mind, other support systems will be required to ensure the safety of the flight (Prats, et al., 2012).
            In order to assure that separation of aircraft can be assured, there are several factors that must be considered; flight rules, airspace class, the flight phase, the performance of the navigation systems, and the air traffic control surveillance means (Prats, et al., 2012). Groups 3 through 5 include tactical, MALE (medium altitude long endurance), and HALE (high altitude long endurance) UAVs. These UAVs fly regional, continental, and intercontinental routes and can fly from the ground up to 60,000 ft. Groups 3, 4, and 5 operate in all classes of airspace within the NAS. While small UAVs generally do not have the power to handle the integration of detect, sense, and avoid technology, larger UAVs such as the ones within groups 3 through 5 should be able to handle the required technology to sense obstacles and other aircraft. Technology that could be implemented include ADS-B, ACAS (autonomous collision avoidance system) and on-board radar (Prats, et al., 2012). Until micro and mini UAVs can be equipped with detect, sense, and avoid technology (which will require a lot of power and will reduce flight times), these small UAVs are likely to be restricted to line of sight operations.
Part 3
            There are several systems currently being utilized by manned aircraft that could be implemented into unmanned aircraft. These systems include ADS-B, ACAS, cameras, and radar. Cameras have been utilized by manned aircraft for many years. Unmanned aircraft have also utilized cameras, especially during times of war. Cameras can allow operators to see everything in front of the UAV and with new cameras having the ability to zoom in close to the ground, cameras will continue to be used during flight operations. ADS-B gives pilots real time information on air traffic, weather, and flight information services (FAA, n.d.). Safety and efficiency will improve as ADS-B is implemented into more aircraft. If UAVs are equipped with ADS-B, it is possible that the technology can be adjusted to give the operator real time updates on air traffic, weather, and flight information. UAVs must be developed to handle this technology before it is implemented. ACAS was developed to reduce the risk of mid-air collisions (Airborne Collision Avoidance System, n.d.). ACAS should enhance the awareness of the operator in relation to other aircraft within the same airspace. In 2016, the U.S. Army completed a test on a new system called Ground Based Sense and Avoid. This radar system should allow UAVs to fly within the NAS while also meeting FAA regulations. This radar system would allow the operator to fly the UAV out of sight while monitoring other aircraft and potential hazards during flight (Iriarte, 2016).


References
Airborne Collision Avoidance System (ACAS). (n.d.). Retrieved from             http://www.skybrary.aero/index.php/Airborne_Collision_Avoidance_System_(ACAS)
Federal Aviation Administration (n.d.). Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen).   Retrieved from https://www.faa.gov/nextgen/programs/adsb/
Iriarte , M. (2016, May 16). U.S Army completes UAS radar-based sense & avoid system test.     Retrieved from http://mil-embedded.com/news/u-s-army-completes-uas-radar-based-          sense-avoid-system-test/
Prats, X., Delgado, L., Ramirez, J., Royo, P., & Pastor, E. (2012). Requirements, Issues, and        Challenges for Sense and Avoid in Unmanned Aircraft Systems. Journal Of Aircraft,        49(3), 677-687. doi:DOI: 10.2514/1.C031606



No comments:

Post a Comment